<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Archive Archives | Maybrey</title>
	<atom:link href="https://maybrey.co.uk/category/archive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://maybrey.hit-this.com/category/archive/</link>
	<description>Maybrey Precision Castings &#124; Aerospace, Heritage &#38; Art Foundry, Kent UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 10:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>George England (1811-1878)</title>
		<link>https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/30/george-england-1811-1878/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gabi.huiam.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 16:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://maybrey.hit-this.com/?p=810</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The full biography of George England: founder of the Hatcham Iron Works, locomotive builder, and one of the most colourful and contentious figures in Victorian engineering history. Compiled from primary sources by Grahame Hood, with research by Chris Jones.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/30/george-england-1811-1878/">George England (1811-1878)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section_0 et_pb_section et_section_regular et_flex_section preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--holx0rd--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1970n6--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1ts49l--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1xv09d--default">
<div class="et_pb_row_0 et_pb_row et_flex_row preset--group--divi-row--divi-background--default">
<div class="et_pb_column_0 et_pb_column et-last-child et_flex_column et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et_flex_column_24_24 et_flex_column_24_24_tablet et_flex_column_24_24_phone preset--group--divi-column--divi-background--default preset--module--divi-column--default">
<div class="et_pb_text_0 et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_module et_flex_module preset--group--divi-text--divi-background--default"><div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/king-george-232x300.jpg" width="232" height="300" alt="" class="wp-image-813 alignnone size-medium" srcset="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/king-george-232x300.jpg 232w, https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/king-george.jpg 303w" sizes="(max-width: 232px) 100vw, 232px" /></span></i></p>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Primary research by Grahame Hood. Additional documentary research by Chris Jones.</span></i></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Many thanks to Chris Jones, who has done so much to check documents and establish the facts about the remarkable Mr England, though a fair bit of speculation still has to be done.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"></span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Origins and early life</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Dictionary of National Biography gives the birth date of George England as 1811 in Newcastle upon Tyne. The previously accepted account was that by the age of 14 he had moved to London to begin an engineering apprenticeship with John Penn and Sons in Greenwich, noted manufacturers of marine steam engines.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Research has identified a George England, married to a Mary Whinney in 1808, whose son George was born on 8th July 1811. Records show four other children: Eliza (1809), Isabella (1813), Anne (1814) and Mary (1816). In July 1832, a George England appeared in the papers for accidentally killing his wife Mary in Swalwell, in the Whickham district of Newcastle upon Tyne, with their daughter Isabella as a witness. The juxtaposition of these names so close to Newcastle makes it almost certain that this was the family George England was born into, although it cannot be absolutely proved.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Chris Jones has speculated that England may not have served a formal apprenticeship at all. Apprenticeships were expensive, and a strong young man with a basic knowledge of blacksmith work would have found employment easily enough. He could have travelled to London by cargo or passenger ship, which regularly ran cheaply up and down the East Coast.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A relative, Henry England, owned land in Peckham Lane and in Kender Street, South London, and George certainly knew him. It is possible that Henry arranged George's early employment and may have provided accommodation.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>First marriage and early career</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">George England first appears in London records on his marriage to Jane Dafter from Wiltshire, at St Clement Dane's church on 28th July 1834. A court case from January 1838, in which Jane had a shawl stolen, confirms he was then living in the Edgeware Road area. There are hints the marriage was not a success: she had spent Christmas 1837 with friends in Greenwich rather than with her husband.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In 1839, England appears in Pigot's Directory with an address at 27 Gloucester Terrace, Vauxhall Bridge Road, giving his profession as Smith. On 30th April 1839, he appears in the minutes of the London and Southampton Railway as being paid for the supply of tools.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The marriage did not last. He left Jane to live with Sarah Hannar, of the same age, with whom he had three children: Mary, born 1841; Eliza Anne, born 1843; and George Junior, born 1844. When his first wife died, he married Sarah. The 1861 census records her as his wife.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>The Hatcham Iron Works</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">By 1839, England had begun renting a vacant factory building on a piece of land between Pomeroy Street and Kender Street, just off the Old Kent Road, in the then semi-rural district of Hatcham, now better known as New Cross. The premises consisted of a cottage, where the family lived, and a manufactory. They had previously been occupied by Henry Duxbury, who was involved in the leather trade.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">England took out Patent No. 8058 on 7th May 1839 for a design of screw jack, and Patent No. 8860 on 2nd March 1841 for a machine for weaving woollens. These inventions made him successful enough to purchase the factory, which he renamed The Hatcham Iron Works. The 1846 edition of the Post Office Directories lists him as: England, George and Co. Engineers and patent screw jack manufacturers, Hatcham Iron Works, Old Kent Road.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">He was already interested in railway engineering, having sold tools to the London and Southampton Railway in 1839, and in 1843 had tried out his manumotive railway carriage on the London and Croydon Railway. He began building locomotives, selling his first in 1849. His locomotive Little England was at the Great Exhibition of 1851 and was awarded a gold medal. His locomotives sold in the UK, Europe, India, and Australia.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The factory was extended in 1853, being largely occupied at that time in making castings for the Crystal Palace. A further, larger extension was added to the buildings in Pomeroy Street in 1861/2, this time on the north side of the original works. At the rear of the new works was a piece of land used to lay an oval of standard gauge track for testing locomotives in steam.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">By 1861, the factory had expanded twice. In 1858 England built Hatcham Lodge for his family and three servants, and a row of houses in Kender Street called Georgina Terrace, to house his workmen.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Character and reputation</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">England was known as an autocrat. The railway historian C. Hamilton Ellis wrote of him:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“George England, who was an industrialist and no gentleman... George England was very proud of his little engine (Little England), which was taken to provide the design for his letter headings for several years.”</span></i></p>
</blockquote>
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: none;">
<ol>
<li><i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Hamilton Ellis, The North British Railway, Ian Allan, 2nd Edition, 1959, p.50 et seq.</span></i></li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In November 1858, England was charged with unlawfully assaulting and beating his apprentice, George Effingham Pattie. England's defence was that the apprentice had stolen spanners belonging to his son. The magistrate fined him five shillings and costs, adding that the defendant had been rather too free with his correction.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">England was a director of the Crystal Palace Company from 1857. A significant fraud by the registrar William Robson, who defrauded the company of £28,000, caused the other nine directors to ask England to resign. He initially refused, stating that his enemies were using his family affairs as an excuse. He eventually resigned, despite a vote of shareholders urging him to stay.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Robert Fairlie and the elopement</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">By 1861, a frequent visitor to Hatcham Lodge was Robert Francis Fairlie, an engineer born in Glasgow in 1831. Fairlie had returned to London and was working as a consultant engineer. Though much of the talk between England and Fairlie was of engineering matters, Robert paid considerable attention to Miss Eliza Anne England, known as Lizzie. At 17, George thought Lizzie too young to be courted seriously and asked Fairlie to wait.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In January 1862, Lizzie and her sister went to the Crystal Palace for the day. Only Mary returned. By the time George and Sarah discovered what had happened, the couple had eloped, having gained a marriage licence after Fairlie signed an affidavit claiming to have her father's permission. They were already on the Boat Train. When the couple returned from their honeymoon in Spain, George took Fairlie to court for perjury.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The resulting case at the Central Criminal Court, reported in The Times of 8th April 1862, caused much public interest. Under cross-examination, England was forced to admit that he had run away with his present wife Sarah Hannar, the mother of Eliza, while his first wife was still living. By a quirk of English law at the time, a child born out of wedlock was considered nobody's child: Eliza had no legal relationship to England and could marry whom she pleased. There was no case to answer and a verdict of not guilty was returned. The families were eventually reconciled, possibly when the first grandchild appeared, and Fairlie gradually became involved in England's work.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>The 1865 strike and its aftermath</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Around 26th January 1865, George England's workforce went on strike. The strike lasted five weeks and proved devastating for the company. England lost a significant order from the South Eastern Railway, losing much of his skilled workforce to other employers. His capable manager, Cleminson, also departed. For a full account of the strike, see the separate archive article The 1865 Strike.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Later years and death</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">England retired in 1869. The company was taken over by his son, George England Junior, and Francis Fairlie, trading as The Fairlie Engine and Steam Carriage Company. This new company was not successful and when George Junior died in 1870, Fairlie closed the works.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">George England Senior died in Cannes, France, in 1878.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Hamilton Ellis: a contemporary assessment</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The railway historian C. Hamilton Ellis offered the following characterisation, noting that the company's difficulties arose principally from the 1865 strike:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“The firm fell on evil days in the sixties, chiefly through an engineering strike which cost it some important contracts, and led to its winding up. Sir William Hardman recorded some pungent incidental scandals; that England was much involved with the Crystal Palace, made enemies in connection therewith, and was attacked on moral grounds because he prosecuted for perjury the interesting Mr Fairlie, who had eloped with an illegitimate daughter of his. Fairlie was acquitted and England's swan-song seems to have been building the Fairlie patent locomotive Little Wonder for the Festiniog Railway. A quaint business, truly!”</span></i></p>
</blockquote>
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: none;">
<ol>
<li><i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Hamilton Ellis, The North British Railway, Ian Allan, 2nd Edition, 1959, p.50 et seq.</span></i></li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
</div></div>
</div>
</div>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/30/george-england-1811-1878/">George England (1811-1878)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Locomotives Built at Hatcham Iron Works: 1849-1855</title>
		<link>https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/29/locomotives-1849-1855/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gabi.huiam.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 19:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://maybrey.hit-this.com/?p=836</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The first part of Grahame Hood's detailed register of locomotives built by George England at the Hatcham Iron Works, covering the earliest period of production from 1849 to 1855. Includes primary source references and commentary on specific locomotives.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/29/locomotives-1849-1855/">Locomotives Built at Hatcham Iron Works: 1849-1855</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section_1 et_pb_section et_section_regular et_flex_section preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--holx0rd--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1970n6--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1ts49l--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1xv09d--default">
<div class="et_pb_row_1 et_pb_row et_flex_row preset--group--divi-row--divi-background--default">
<div class="et_pb_column_1 et_pb_column et-last-child et_block_column et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et_flex_column_24_24 et_flex_column_24_24_tablet et_flex_column_24_24_phone preset--group--divi-column--divi-background--default preset--module--divi-column--default">
<div class="et_pb_text_1 et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_module et_flex_module preset--group--divi-text--divi-background--default"><div class="et_pb_text_inner"><article><em>Compiled by Grahame Hood. Based initially on J.W. Lowe's <cite>British Steam Locomotive Builders</cite>, Goose and Son, Norwich, 1975, reprinted in London's Industrial Archaeology, 1984. Additional sources include C.H. Rickon's articles in the Stephenson Locomotive Society's Journal, 1961. Many thanks also to Geoff Smith for newspaper references.</em></p>
<p>This list was initially based on the one published in J.W. Lowe's <cite>British Steam Locomotive Builders</cite>. I am certain there were some errors and also that more locomotives were built than have been recorded. I have added as much new information as I can from such sources as I can find. I have not repeated any information from new sources that agrees with previously known information, but have provided alternative information where it may possibly be correct.</p>
<p>There are many errors that appeared in print, particularly in the early railway press. For example, that the cancellation of the 1852 order for locomotives to Russia ruined the company, or that Scott was the locomotive that appeared at the 1862 Great Exhibition. I would be delighted to receive further information on any aspect of the Hatcham Ironworks output.</p>
<p><strong>Format:</strong> Year / Works No. / Wheel arrangement / Cylinders / Driving wheel / Gauge / Operator / Name or number</p>
<hr />
<h2></h2>
<h2>1843</h2>
<h3>Manumotive Railway Carriage</h3>
<blockquote>
<p>"A machine of this description is in use upon the London and Croydon Railway, having been lately made for Mr Gregory, the Resident Engineer, by Mr George England, Engineer. The machine is very light and elegant in appearance, and is capable of carrying seven or eight persons at a rate of 18 miles per hour."</p>
<footer>— <cite>The Railway Times</cite>, 21st October 1843.</footer>
</blockquote>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1848/1849</h2>
<p>Works no. n/k / 2-2-2WT / Inside cylinders 7" × 12" (later 9" × 12") / Driving wheel 4ft 6in / Standard gauge / London and Brighton Railway / <strong>Little England</strong></p>
<p>In November 1848, the <cite>Mining Journal</cite> reported England's first locomotive experiments in considerable detail. Trials took place between New Cross and Croydon. From February 1st 1849, <em>Little England</em> began working the Lynn and Wisbech branch of the East Anglia Railway. It is likely she soon returned to the works for modification, including fitting of 9 by 12 inch cylinders, removal of name, and sale.</p>
<p><small><cite>The Railway Times</cite>, 2nd and 9th December 1848; <cite>The Morning Herald</cite>, 11th December 1848; <cite>The Railway Times</cite>, 3rd March 1849.</small></p>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1849</h2>
<ul>
<li>Works no. ? / 2-2-2WT / Inside cylinders 9" × 12" / Driving wheel 4ft 6in / Standard gauge / Dundee, Perth and Aberdeen Junction Railway / <strong>Eclipse</strong>
<p><small>C.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1962, p.207.</small></p>
</li>
<li>Works no. ? / 2-2-2WT / Inside cylinders 9" × 12" / Driving wheel 4ft 6in / Standard gauge / London and Blackwall Railway / <strong>Dwarf</strong>
<p>Delivered September 1849. Price £1,000. Resold to makers August 1851 for £700 against two new engines (<em>Samson</em> and <em>Hercules</em> of 1852).</p>
<p><small>C.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1962, p.207; E. Craven, SLS Journal, 1955, p.306.</small></p>
</li>
</ul>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1850</h2>
<ul>
<li>Works no. ? / 2-2-2WT / Inside cylinders 9" × 12" / Driving wheel 4ft 6in / Standard gauge / London and Blackwall Railway / <strong>Pigmy Giant</strong>
<p>Delivered January 1850. Price £950. Resold to makers August 1851 for £700 against two new engines (<em>Samson</em> and <em>Hercules</em> of 1852). As they were sold back on part exchange it is possible they stayed on the L&amp;B until the new engines were delivered and did not actually return to the makers until 1852, though this is speculation.</p>
<p><small>C.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1962, p.207; E. Craven, SLS Journal, 1955, p.306.</small></p>
</li>
<li>Works no. ? / 2-2-2WT / Inside cylinders 9" × 12" / Driving wheel 4ft 6in / Standard gauge / Edinburgh and Glasgow Railway / <strong>England</strong> <em>(also referred to as Little Scotland or Wee Scotland; see Addendum)</em>
<p>England and Co. guaranteed these light engines to haul trains of six carriages at a speed of 40 miles per hour on gradients of 1 in 100, at a coke consumption of only 10lb. per mile. The engine frequently ran in before its time and the driver had to be ordered to take longer on the trips for fear of an accident. During the heavy winds and gales of January 1851, the <em>Little England</em> was the only locomotive on the line that kept time.</p>
<p><small>Campbell Highet, <cite>Scottish Locomotive History 1831–1923</cite>, George Allen and Unwin, 1970, p.48; G.A. Sekon, <cite>Evolution of the Steam Locomotive</cite>, 1899, pp.142–143.</small></p>
</li>
<li>Works no. ? / 2-2-2WT / Inside cylinders 9" × 12" / Driving wheel 4ft 6in / Standard gauge / Liverpool Crosby and Stockport Railway / <strong>England</strong>
<p>Delivered September 1850. Price £1,200. This engine frequently drew ten carriages under the conditions laid down for seven.</p>
<p><small>G.A. Sekon, <cite>Evolution of the Steam Locomotive</cite>, 1899, pp.142–143; C.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1962, p.207.</small></p>
</li>
<li>Works no. ? / 2-2-2WT / Inside cylinders 9" × 12" / Driving wheel 4ft 6in / Standard gauge / Exhibition engine / <strong>Little England</strong> (Gold Medal, Great Exhibition 1851)
<p><small>C.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1962, p.207.</small></p>
</li>
<li>Works no. ? / 2-2-2WT / Inside cylinders 9" × 12" / Driving wheel 4ft 6in / Standard gauge / Namur-Liege Railway / <em>n/k</em>
<p>Probable delivery around 1851, based on a report in <cite>Herepath's Railway Journal</cite> for 1850, p.1229.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1852</h2>
<ul>
<li>Works no. ? / 2-2-2WT / Outside cylinders 15" × 18" / Driving wheel 5ft 6in / Standard gauge / London and Blackwall Railway / <strong>No. 8 Samson</strong>
<p>Renumbered Great Eastern Railway 99 on takeover 1/1/66, renumbered 990 in 1878, scrapped October 1881. Cost £1,750. Built to the same design as <em>Victoria</em>, already working on the London and Blackwall.</p>
<p><small>A.R. Bennett, <cite>Locomotive Building in London</cite>, Railway Magazine, November 1907, pp.387–388; H.L. Hopwood, <cite>The London and Blackwall Railway</cite>, Railway Magazine, January–June 1927, pp.341–342; E. Craven, SLS Journal, 1955, p.306.</small></p>
</li>
<li>Works no. ? / 2-2-2WT / Outside cylinders 15" × 18" / Driving wheel 5ft 6in / Standard gauge / London and Blackwall Railway / <strong>No. 9 Hercules</strong>
<p>Renumbered Great Eastern Railway 100 on takeover 1/1/66. Out of service June 1866, scrapped April 1870.</p>
</li>
<li>Works nos. ? / 2-4-0 / Outside cylinders 16" × 20" / Driving wheel 5ft 0in / Standard gauge / Caledonian Railway / <strong>Nos. 144–149</strong>
<p>These locomotives are supposed to have been a cancelled order for Russia. Around this time Russian railways standardised to 5 foot gauge, and this, along with difficulty in paying for the order, probably led to the cancellation. The Caledonian bought them in 1854. Two others of this sort were bought in 1852 by the Scottish firm C. Dunlop and Co. and named <em>Cuilhill</em> and <em>Monkland</em>. They were sold to the Caledonian in 1857 and numbered 182 and 183.</p>
<p><small><cite>The Locomotive</cite>, 15th May 1941, p.14; <cite>Industrial Locomotives of Scotland</cite>, ILS, 1976, p.95.</small></p>
</li>
</ul>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1853</h2>
<ul>
<li>Works nos. ? / 2-4-0 / Outside cylinders 16" × 20" / Driving wheel 5ft 0in / Standard gauge / Caledonian Railway / <strong>Nos. 150–151</strong></li>
</ul>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1852/3</h2>
<ul>
<li>Works nos. ? / 2-4-0 / Outside cylinders 16" × 22" / Driving wheel 4ft 9in / Standard gauge / Dundee, Perth and Aberdeen Junction Railway / <strong>Nos. 13 Scorpion, 14 Spitfire, 15 Sprite</strong>
<p>No. 15 was purchased in 1855, presumably being one left on the maker's hands by a cancelled order. The three engines passed to the Scottish Central Railway, Nos. 13 and 14 by sale in April 1860, No. 15 at the takeover in 1863.</p>
<p><small>C.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1961, p.209.</small></p>
</li>
</ul>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1854/5</h2>
<ul>
<li>Works nos. ? / details n/k / Standard gauge / West Flanders Railway / Nos. n/k
<p><small>C.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1961, p.209.</small></p>
</li>
</ul>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1855</h2>
<ul>
<li>Works no. ? / details n/k / Standard gauge / Sambre et Meuse Railway
<p>This engine ended up as No. 90 on the Grand Central Belge.</p>
<p><small>C.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1961, p.209.</small></p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr />
<h2></h2>
<h2>Addenda</h2>
<ol>
<li><strong>Ophir:</strong> A locomotive named <em>Ophir</em> was purchased in March 1866 by Isaac Boulton at an auction in Grays Chalk Quarries, Essex. At the time it was a 2-2-0, with leading wheels of 2ft diameter and drivers of 5ft, with three inside cylinders, all 5 by 10 inches. Whether it originated at Hatcham is uncertain. C.H. Dickon considered that it being a Hatcham product does not seem likely.</li>
<li><strong>What happened to <em>Pigmy Giant</em> and the Exhibition locomotive?</strong> Multiple later sightings of engines named <em>Little England</em> have been recorded by various historians, but their exact identities remain uncertain.</li>
<li><strong>Wee Scotland:</strong> What was the locomotive supplied to the Edinburgh and Glasgow actually called? G.A. Sekon refers to <em>Little England</em>, Campbell Highet calls it <em>Little Scotland</em>, and Hamilton Ellis calls it <em>Wee Scotland</em>. There was a locomotive of that name but it was not an England locomotive. Surely <em>Wee Scotland</em> was a jocular riposte to <em>Little England</em>?</li>
</ol>
</article>
</div></div>

<div class="et_pb_gallery_0 et_pb_gallery et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_gallery_grid et_pb_module preset--group--divi-gallery--divi-background--default" data-auto-rotate="off" data-auto-rotate-speed=""><div class="et_pb_gallery_items et_post_gallery clearfix et_grid_module" data-per_page="4"><div class="et_pb_gallery_item et_pb_grid_item et_pb_gallery_item_0_0"><div class="et_pb_gallery_image landscape" data-per_page="4"><a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives-1.jpg" title="locomotives-1"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="512" height="262" src="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives-1.jpg" alt="Maybrey Precision Castings" class="wp-image-873" srcset="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives-1.jpg 479w, https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives-1.jpg 480w" sizes="(max-width:479px) 479px, 100vw" /><span class="et_overlay" data-icon="" data-icon-tablet="" data-icon-phone=""></span></a></div></div><div class="et_pb_gallery_item et_pb_grid_item et_pb_gallery_item_0_1"><div class="et_pb_gallery_image landscape" data-per_page="4"><a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives2.jpg" title="locomotives2"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="512" height="257" src="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives2.jpg" alt="Maybrey Precision Castings" class="wp-image-874" srcset="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives2.jpg 479w, https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives2.jpg 480w" sizes="(max-width:479px) 479px, 100vw" /><span class="et_overlay" data-icon="" data-icon-tablet="" data-icon-phone=""></span></a></div></div><div class="et_pb_gallery_item et_pb_grid_item et_pb_gallery_item_0_2"><div class="et_pb_gallery_image landscape" data-per_page="4"><a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives-3.jpg" title="locomotives-3"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="400" height="284" src="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives-3-400x284.jpg" alt="Maybrey Precision Castings" class="wp-image-875" srcset="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives-3.jpg 479w, https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives-3-400x284.jpg 480w" sizes="(max-width:479px) 479px, 100vw" /><span class="et_overlay" data-icon="" data-icon-tablet="" data-icon-phone=""></span></a></div></div><div class="et_pb_gallery_item et_pb_grid_item et_pb_gallery_item_0_3"><div class="et_pb_gallery_image landscape" data-per_page="4"><a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives4.jpg" title="locomotives4"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="222" height="150" src="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives4.jpg" alt="Maybrey Precision Castings" class="wp-image-876" srcset="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives4.jpg 479w, https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/locomotives4.jpg 480w" sizes="(max-width:479px) 479px, 100vw" /><span class="et_overlay" data-icon="" data-icon-tablet="" data-icon-phone=""></span></a></div></div></div></div>
</div>
</div>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/29/locomotives-1849-1855/">Locomotives Built at Hatcham Iron Works: 1849-1855</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Francis Fairlie (1831-1885)</title>
		<link>https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/28/robert-francis-fairlie/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gabi.huiam.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2022 19:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://maybrey.hit-this.com/?p=815</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The full archive account of Robert Francis Fairlie: engineer, patentee, and inventor of the double-bogie locomotive that bears his name. Includes the detailed account of his patent, his time at Hatcham, and a record of his grave at West Norwood Cemetery.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/28/robert-francis-fairlie/">Robert Francis Fairlie (1831-1885)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section_2 et_pb_section et_section_regular et_flex_section preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--holx0rd--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1970n6--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1ts49l--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1xv09d--default">
<div class="et_pb_row_2 et_pb_row et_flex_row preset--group--divi-row--divi-background--default">
<div class="et_pb_column_2 et_pb_column et-last-child et_flex_column et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et_flex_column_24_24 et_flex_column_24_24_tablet et_flex_column_24_24_phone preset--group--divi-column--divi-background--default preset--module--divi-column--default">
<div class="et_pb_text_2 et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_module et_flex_module preset--group--divi-text--divi-background--default"><div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/robert-maybrey-225x300.jpg" width="225" height="300" alt="" class="wp-image-825 alignnone size-medium" srcset="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/robert-maybrey-225x300.jpg 225w, https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/robert-maybrey.jpg 303w" sizes="(max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px" /></span></i></p>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Primary research by Grahame Hood.</span></i></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Robert Francis Fairlie was born in March 1831, of an engineering family.</span></p>
<h3><span style="font-weight: 400;"></span></h3>
<h3><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br /><strong>Training and early career</strong></span></h3>
<blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Crewe and Swindon gave him his training as a locomotive engineer, to such effect that he was appointed at 22 to superintend and manage the Londonderry and Coleraine Railway, though he went shortly afterwards to India to the Bombay and Baroda Railway. Later (in 1859) he became established as a consulting engineer at 56 Gracechurch Street, London EC.”</span></i></p>
</blockquote>
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: none;">
<ol>
<li><i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Seymour, The Year of the Fairlie, Railway Magazine, September 1969, p.490 onwards.</span></i></li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
<h3><strong></strong></h3>
<h3><strong>The Fairlie patent</strong></h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">It was during this period that the idea for his patent germinated. Patent No. 1210, for improvements in locomotive engines and boilers, was granted on 12th May 1864. It covered the attainment of high tractive effort for low axle-loading, with flexibility of wheel-base. The adoption of total adhesion was to increase the grip on the rails. The boiler was to be mounted on the centres of two frames resting on the bogies.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A less well-known aspect of the patent was the provision of a second or even third layer of tubes in the boiler, reversing the gas flow to provide extra heating and drying of the steam before it passed to the cylinders.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In the same year Fairlie published a pamphlet, Locomotive Engines: What They Are and What They Ought to Be, in which he expounded, by means of a dialogue between an engineer and a writer, the current shortcomings of conventional steam engines. These included the wasteful need to carry a tender for fuel and water, the inadequacy of conventional tank engines for long runs, and the lack of standardisation. He then showed how his patent locomotive would overcome all these objections through superior steam generating, the all-adhesion principle, the ability to traverse sharp curves with reduced friction, and the abolition of turntables.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">It has been said that Fairlie's idea was not original, since one of the competitors in the Semmering trials of 1851 was the Seraing, by the Belgian firm of Cockerill, which had all the features of the developed Fairlie locomotive. But the Seraing did not initiate a trend, whereas Fairlie developed his patent into engines built and sold all over the world.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A second patent, No. 3185 of 9th December 1865, proposed a modified engine with the fuel and water carried on the same chassis as the boiler and cab, but with only one boiler.</span></p>
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: none;">
<ol>
<li><i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Seymour, The Year of the Fairlie, Railway Magazine, September 1969, p.490 onwards.</span></i></li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
<h3><span style="font-weight: 400;"></span></h3>
<h3>At Hatcham and the elopement</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">By 1861, Fairlie was a frequent visitor to Hatcham Lodge. In January 1862 he eloped with George England's daughter Eliza Anne, having signed an affidavit claiming he had her father's permission to marry. England sued Fairlie for perjury. The case at the Central Criminal Court was widely reported: England was forced to admit under cross-examination that Eliza had been born out of wedlock and had no legal relationship to him. There was no case to answer and a not guilty verdict was returned. The families were eventually reconciled and Fairlie became involved in England's work. For the full account, see the archive article on George England.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Little Wonder and the Festiniog Railway</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In 1868, the narrow gauge Festiniog Railway decided to trial the Fairlie design. England built the locomotive Little Wonder (Works No. not recorded), an 0-4-4-0T with outside cylinders of 8.25 by 13 inches and driving wheels of 2 feet 4 inches on 1 foot 11.5 inch gauge. This was a great success and was demonstrated to engineers from all over the world.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>The Fairlie Engine and Steam Carriage Company</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">With George England Junior, Fairlie took over Hatcham as The Fairlie Engine and Steam Carriage Company, to build locomotives to his design and his patent steam carriage. George Junior's early death, and a lack of orders, led Fairlie to close the works. Apart from the steam carriage and Little Wonder, only four locomotives were produced under the new company name. Hatcham was sold in 1872.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Fairlie then formed The Fairlie Engine and Rolling Stock Company, to work as a consulting engineer and grant licences for locomotives to be built under his patent by other makers. More than 330 patent locomotives were built and exported to 21 countries in every continent with railways.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In 1873 Fairlie went to Venezuela to survey a new line. He contracted sunstroke, a fever, and blood poisoning there and never fully recovered, though he continued to work, travel, and carry out his business.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Robert Francis Fairlie died on 31st July 1885. He was 54 years old.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Fairlie's grave: West Norwood Cemetery</h3>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Field visit by Grahame Hood, 8th July 2014.</span></i></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Robert Fairlie is buried in West Norwood Cemetery. The grave is number 20788, in square 22, a little back from the path.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The register in the cemetery office shows that the plot cost £26 5s and contains:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Robert Francis Fairlie (buried 1885)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">John Simpson Fraser (1891)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mary Fraser (1906)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Elizabeth A. Fairlie (1907)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The gravestone is nearly six feet tall and bears the following inscriptions:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Robert Francis Fairlie. Who died July 31st 1885. Aged 54 years.”</span></i></p>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Also of Lily his wife. Who died April 15th 1907. Aged 63 years.”</span></i></p>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“John Simpson Fraser. Brother-in-law to the above. Died July 18th 1891. Aged 69 years.”</span></i></p>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“And of Mary, his wife. Who died May 11th 1906. Aged 84 years.”</span></i></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">John Fraser was Fairlie's partner in the takeover of Hatcham along with George England Junior. Fraser was born 1822, as was Mary his wife. Mary was presumably Fairlie's older sister.</span></p>
</div></div>
</div>
</div>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/28/robert-francis-fairlie/">Robert Francis Fairlie (1831-1885)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Locomotives Built at Hatcham Iron Works: 1856-1861</title>
		<link>https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/27/locomotives-1856-1861/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gabi.huiam.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2022 20:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://maybrey.hit-this.com/?p=840</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The second part of Grahame Hood's locomotive register, covering the period 1856 to 1861: a time of considerable expansion for the Hatcham Iron Works, with orders fulfilled for railways in Australia, India, Scotland, and across England.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/27/locomotives-1856-1861/">Locomotives Built at Hatcham Iron Works: 1856-1861</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section_3 et_pb_section et_section_regular et_block_section preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--holx0rd--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1970n6--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1ts49l--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1xv09d--default">
<div class="et_pb_row_3 et_pb_row et_block_row preset--group--divi-row--divi-background--default">
<div class="et_pb_column_3 et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et-last-child et_block_column et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough preset--group--divi-column--divi-background--default preset--module--divi-column--default">
<div class="et_pb_text_3 et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_module et_block_module preset--group--divi-text--divi-background--default"><div class="et_pb_text_inner"><article><em>Compiled by Grahame Hood. Format: Year / Works No. / Wheel arrangement / Cylinders / Driving wheel / Gauge / Operator / Name or number.</em></article>
<article><em></em></article>
<article>
<hr />
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1856</h2>
<p>Works no. 139 / 2-2-2WT / Inside cylinders 14" × 19" / Driving wheel 4ft 6in / Standard gauge / Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway / <strong>No. 123 Carlisle</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1856</h2>
<p>Works no. n/k / 2-4-0 / Outside cylinders 15.5" × 20" / Driving wheel 5ft 0in / Standard gauge / South Yorkshire Railway / <strong>No. 13</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1856</h2>
<p>Works no. n/k / 2-4-0 / Outside cylinders 15.5" × 18" / Driving wheel 5ft 0in / Standard gauge / London and South Western Railway Engineering Dept. / <strong>Hawkshaw</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1857</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k / 2-2-2 and 0-6-0 types / Various cylinders / 5ft 3in gauge / Geelong and South Suburban Railway / <strong>Nos. 1–5</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1857</h2>
<p>Works no. n/k / 0-4-0WT / Outside cylinders 9" × 12" / Driving wheel 3ft 0in / Standard gauge / Sandy and Potton Railway / <strong>Shannon</strong></p>
<p>Built for Captain Sir William Peel RN VC, at a cost of £800. Named after the steam frigate he commanded. Captain Peel never saw his railway in operation, dying at Cawnpore on 20th April 1858 after service in the Indian Mutiny. <em>Shannon</em> later passed to the LNWR, then to the Wantage Tramway, where she gave many years of service. She was preserved in 1946 and placed on display at Wantage Road GWR station.</p>
<p><small>Reg Wilkinson, <cite>The Wantage Tramway</cite>, Oakwood Press, 2nd Edition, 1995; <cite>The Railway Magazine</cite>, November 1975, p.579; <cite>The Railway Magazine</cite>, August 1957, p.588.</small></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1858</h2>
<p>Works no. n/k / 2-4-0 / Outside cylinders 15" × 18" / Driving wheel 5ft 0in / Standard gauge / London and South Western Railway Engineering Dept. / <strong>Brunel</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1859</h2>
<p>Works nos. 142, n/k (×3) / 2-2-2 / Cylinders 14" × 22" / Driving wheel 6ft 6in / 5ft 3in gauge / Victorian Government Railway / <strong>Nos. 12, 13, 15, 17</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1859</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k (×6) / 2-4-0WT / Cylinders 11" × 17" / Driving wheel 4ft 0in / 5ft 6in gauge / Bombay, Baroda and Central India Railway</p>
<p>Six ballasting engines were ordered, two of which were shipped and arrived by January 1860. On 2nd November 1859, news reached London that the ship <em>Jessica</em>, containing the other four engines, had been abandoned at sea and was a total loss. The four lost engines were not reordered from George England, being replaced by four similar engines built by the Vulcan Foundry (Nos. 449–452 of 1860).</p>
<p><small>C.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1962, p.144.</small></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1859</h2>
<p>Works no. n/k / 2-4-0 / Outside cylinders 15" × 18" / Driving wheel 5ft 0in / Standard gauge / London and South Western Railway Engineering Dept. / <strong>Hesketh</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1860</h2>
<p>Works nos. 160, 161 / 2-4-0T / Cylinders 15" × 20" / Driving wheel n/k / 5ft 3in gauge / Melbourne and Suburban Railway / <strong>Hawthorn, Richmond</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1860</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k / 2-4-0T / Outside cylinders 15" × 22" / Driving wheel 4ft 0in / Standard gauge / London and Blackwall Railway / <strong>Nos. 10, 11</strong></p>
<p>In 1866 renumbered 101 and 102 by the Great Eastern Railway. Scrapped January and February 1882 respectively.</p>
<p><small>H.L. Hopwood, <cite>The London and Blackwall Railway</cite>, <cite>Railway Magazine</cite>, January–June 1927, pp.341–342.</small></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1861</h2>
<p>Works nos. 156, 157, 158, 159, 164, 165, 166 / 2-4-0ST / Cylinders 16" × 22" / Driving wheel 5ft 0in / 5ft 3in gauge / Victorian Government Railway / <strong>Nos. 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1861</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k / 2-4-0 / Outside cylinders 14" × 18" / Driving wheel 5ft 0in / Standard gauge / London and South Western Railway Engineering Dept. / <strong>Locke, Stephenson</strong></p>
<p><small>C.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1961, p.144.</small></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1861</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k / 2-4-0 / Outside cylinders 16" × 18" / Driving wheel 5ft 0in / Standard gauge / London and South Western Railway Engineering Dept. / <strong>Smeaton, Telford</strong></p>
<p><small>C.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1961, pp.144–145.</small></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1861</h2>
<p>Works no. n/k / 2-4-0T / Outside cylinders 11" × 16" / Driving wheel 3ft 10in / Standard gauge / London and South Western Railway Engineering Dept. / <strong>Scott</strong></p>
<p>Purchased for £1,890 on 23rd January 1862. Broken up June 1909.</p>
<p><small>C.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1961, p.145.</small></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1861</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k / 2-4-0 and 2-4-0T types / Inside cylinders 15" × 18" / Driving wheel 5ft 0in / Standard gauge / Somerset Central Railway / <strong>Nos. 1–8</strong></p>
<p>Eight four-coupled engines at £1,850 each and six four-wheel tenders at £300 each, ordered for delivery in August and September 1861. Construction went ahead as scheduled: by 1st July, the six tenders and four of the engines were assembled and awaiting delivery.</p>
<p><small><cite>Somerset and Dorset Locomotive History</cite>, D. Bradley and D. Milton, David and Charles, 1973, p.17 onwards.</small></p>
</section>
</article>
</div></div>
</div>
</div>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/27/locomotives-1856-1861/">Locomotives Built at Hatcham Iron Works: 1856-1861</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The England Family in the 1861 Census</title>
		<link>https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/26/england-family-1861-census/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gabi.huiam.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 19:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://maybrey.hit-this.com/?p=831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A transcription and commentary on the 1861 census entries for Hatcham Lodge and Georgina Terrace, the home and workers' cottages built by George England in 1858. The records offer a rare snapshot of domestic life at the works.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/26/england-family-1861-census/">The England Family in the 1861 Census</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section_4 et_pb_section et_section_regular et_flex_section preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--holx0rd--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1970n6--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1ts49l--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1xv09d--default">
<div class="et_pb_row_4 et_pb_row et_flex_row preset--group--divi-row--divi-background--default">
<div class="et_pb_column_4 et_pb_column et-last-child et_flex_column et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et_flex_column_24_24 et_flex_column_24_24_tablet et_flex_column_24_24_phone preset--group--divi-column--divi-background--default preset--module--divi-column--default">
<div class="et_pb_text_4 et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_module et_flex_module preset--group--divi-text--divi-background--default"><div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Primary research by Grahame Hood.</span></i></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">By the time the 1861 census took place, both Hatcham Lodge and Georgina Terrace had been in use for three years. The page transcribed here shows the inhabitants of Hatcham Lodge and Nos. 75-78 Georgina Terrace. They are handwritten and sometimes difficult to decipher.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>74 Kender Street: Hatcham Lodge</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">George England is head of the family, Married, 49 years old, Engineer and Proprietor of Factory, born in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Northumberland.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Sarah England is his wife, 49 years old, born in Lowestoft, Suffolk.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">They have three unmarried children: Mary, 19; Eliza Ann, 17; and George, 16. George is listed as Scholar, though in fact he had been apprenticed to his father's firm since at least 1858. All children are recorded as born in Hatcham, Surrey.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">There are three servants, all unmarried: Emma King, Cook (Domestic), 35, born in Stroud, Gloucestershire; Sarah Hubford, Housemaid, 24, born in Bermondsey, London; and John Blewsell (?), Man Servant, 24, place of birth illegible.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>75 Kender Street: 1 Georgina Terrace</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Occupied by George Andrews, a market gardener, his wife and five children. One child, a boy of 12, is listed as a Telegraph Messenger.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>76 Kender Street: 2 Georgina Terrace</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Occupied by Charles Moore, a coppersmith originally from Wakefield, Yorkshire, his wife, and two children. The son John is 17 and an apprentice coppersmith; the daughter Elizabeth Ann, also 17, is described as an apprentice dress maker (?).</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>77 Kender Street: 3 Georgina Terrace</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The home of George Osborn, a boot maker, his wife, and son.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>78 Kender Street</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Occupied by Joseph Pugett and his wife Jane, aged 66 and 73 respectively. He is listed as Labourer in Engine Factory.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Commentary</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Though England is supposed to have built the houses in Georgina Terrace for the benefit of his workers, they do not always seem to have been occupied by men in his employ. Of the four households recorded here, only Joseph Pugett at No. 78 is clearly employed at the works.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"></span></p>
</div></div>

<div class="et_pb_image_0 et_pb_image et_pb_module et_flex_module preset--group--divi-image--divi-background--default"><span class="et_pb_image_wrap"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/england-family.jpg" title="england-family" width="1536" height="1144" srcset="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/england-family.jpg 1536w, https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/england-family-1280x953.jpg 1280w, https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/england-family-980x730.jpg 980w, https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/england-family-480x358.jpg 480w" sizes="(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) and (max-width: 980px) 980px, (min-width: 981px) and (max-width: 1280px) 1280px, (min-width: 1281px) 1536px, 100vw" class="wp-image-870" /></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/26/england-family-1861-census/">The England Family in the 1861 Census</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Locomotives Built at Hatcham Iron Works: 1862-1867</title>
		<link>https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/25/locomotives-1862-1867/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gabi.huiam.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 20:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://maybrey.hit-this.com/?p=842</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The third part of Grahame Hood's locomotive register, covering 1862 to 1867: the final productive years at Hatcham, including the celebrated Festiniog Railway engines and the fateful South Eastern Railway order disrupted by the 1865 strike.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/25/locomotives-1862-1867/">Locomotives Built at Hatcham Iron Works: 1862-1867</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section_5 et_pb_section et_section_regular et_block_section preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--holx0rd--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1970n6--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1ts49l--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1xv09d--default">
<div class="et_pb_row_5 et_pb_row et_block_row preset--group--divi-row--divi-background--default">
<div class="et_pb_column_5 et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et-last-child et_block_column et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough preset--group--divi-column--divi-background--default preset--module--divi-column--default">
<div class="et_pb_text_5 et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_module et_block_module preset--group--divi-text--divi-background--default"><div class="et_pb_text_inner"><article><em>Compiled by Grahame Hood. Format: Year / Works No. / Wheel arrangement / Cylinders / Driving wheel / Gauge / Operator / Name or number.</em></p>
<hr />
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1862</h2>
<p>Works nos. 185–192 / 2-4-0 / Inside cylinders 16" × 24" / Driving wheel 6ft 6in / Standard gauge / Great Western Railway / <strong>Nos. 149–156</strong> (No. 154 named <strong>Chancellor</strong>)</p>
<p>Around 1862, A.R. Rosling recalled seeing in the erecting shop in Pomeroy Street two 2-4-0 long-boiler engines standing apart with their tenders, both painted in blue. These were eventually sold to the London and South Western Railway about 1865 as Nos. 201 and 202. He noted:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"These locomotives were remarkable for having two safety valves, one lock-up and one spring balance, which were provided with covers of the shape designed by Sir Daniel Gooch for his broad gauge engines after he abandoned the haycock dome, and made famous by the Lord of the Isles class. No other instance of the transportation of this design of cover to a railway unconnected with the Great Western Railway is known to the writer."</p>
</blockquote>
<p><small>A.R. Rosling, <cite>Locomotive Building in London</cite>, Railway Magazine, November 1907, p.387.</small></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1863</h2>
<p>Works nos. 199, 200 / 0-4-0T / Outside cylinders 8" × 12" / Driving wheel 2ft 0in / 1ft 11.5in gauge / Festiniog Railway / <strong>No. 1 The Princess, No. 2 The Prince</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1863</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k / 2-4-0T / Outside cylinders 11" × 16" / Driving wheel 4ft 0in / Standard gauge / Colne Valley and Halstead Railway / <strong>Cam, Colne</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1863</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k / 2-4-0 / Inside cylinders 16" × 18" / Driving wheel 5ft 0in / Standard gauge / Somerset and Dorset Railway / <strong>Nos. 9, 10</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1864</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k / 0-4-0T / Outside cylinders 8" × 12" / Driving wheel 2ft 0in / 1ft 11.5in gauge / Festiniog Railway / <strong>No. 3 Mountaineer, No. 4 Palmerston</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1864</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k / 2-4-0 / Inside cylinders 16" × 18" / Driving wheel 5ft 0in / Standard gauge / Somerset and Dorset Railway / <strong>Nos. 12, 13, 14, 15</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1865</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k / 2-4-0 / Outside cylinders 16" × 18" / Driving wheel 5ft 0in / Standard gauge / London and South Western Railway / <strong>Nos. 201, 202</strong></p>
<p>Accepted 18th August 1864, paid 13th October. Transferred to the Engineers Department as No. 9 <strong>Harrison</strong> and No. 10 <strong>Bidder</strong> in August 1875 and April 1876 respectively. Both broken up June 1889.</p>
<p><small>C.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1961, p.145.</small></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1865</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k / 2-4-0 / Inside cylinders 16" × 24" / Driving wheel 6ft 0in / Standard gauge / Somerset and Dorset Railway / <strong>Nos. 17, 18</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1865</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k / 2-4-0 / Inside cylinders 16" × 24" / Driving wheel 6ft 0in / Standard gauge / South Eastern Railway / <strong>Nos. 215–218</strong></p>
<p>Originally part of an order for 20 locomotives (Nos. 215–234). Only four were completed and accepted by the SER following the 1865 strike. Of the remaining ten, two went to the Somerset and Dorset Railway and the rest to the Belgian West Flanders Railway (Flanders Occidentale). C.H. Dickson notes they may not have been delivered to Belgium until 1868, and some sources indicate two were sold to Genoa, Italy, with six going to Belgium.</p>
<p><small>C.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1961, p.211; <cite>Somerset and Dorset Railway History</cite>, D. Bradley and D. Milton, David and Charles, 1973, p.22.</small></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1865</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k / 2-4-0 / Inside cylinders 16" × 24" / Driving wheel 6ft 0in / Standard gauge / West Flanders Railway (Flanders Occidentale) / <strong>Nos. n/k (six to eight locomotives)</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>"In 1863 Messrs England and Co supplied six engines to the West Flanders Railway Co, which were also of Mr Cudworth's No. 185 type. The divided fire-boxes, however, which formed the principal feature of that design, were removed after some experience in Belgium, and replaced by others of the Belpaire type. Thus altered, all six engines are still working in Belgium (1909). Some have been rebuilt with boilers of a different design, but all the class are still at work after a life of forty-four years, which speaks very well for the workmanship put into their engines by England and Co."</p>
</blockquote>
<p><small>A.R. Rosling, <cite>Locomotive Building in London</cite>, Railway Magazine, November 1907, pp.386–387. Note: Grahame Hood observes the dating in this account may refer to engines delivered as late as 1868 as part of the cancelled SER order.</small></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1867</h2>
<p>Works nos. 234, 235 / 0-4-0T / Outside cylinders 8.5" × 12" / Driving wheel 2ft 2in / 1ft 11.5in gauge / Festiniog Railway / <strong>No. 5 Welsh Pony, No. 6 Little Giant</strong></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1867</h2>
<p>Works nos. n/k / 2-4-0 / Inside cylinders 16" × 24" / Driving wheel 6ft 0in / Standard gauge / Neath and Brecon Railway / <strong>No. 1 Neath, No. 2 Brecon</strong></p>
</section>
</article>
</div></div>
</div>
</div>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/25/locomotives-1862-1867/">Locomotives Built at Hatcham Iron Works: 1862-1867</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 1865 Strike</title>
		<link>https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/24/the-1865-strike/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gabi.huiam.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 19:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://maybrey.hit-this.com/?p=834</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A detailed account of the five-week strike at the Hatcham Iron Works in January-March 1865, drawn from contemporary newspaper reports in The Times, the Bristol Times, the Kentish Mercury, and the South London Press. The strike proved catastrophic for the company, leading to the cancellation of a major South Eastern Railway order and the permanent loss of much of the skilled workforce.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/24/the-1865-strike/">The 1865 Strike</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section_6 et_pb_section et_section_regular et_flex_section preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--holx0rd--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1970n6--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1ts49l--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1xv09d--default">
<div class="et_pb_row_6 et_pb_row et_block_row preset--group--divi-row--divi-background--default">
<div class="et_pb_column_6 et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et-last-child et_block_column et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough preset--group--divi-column--divi-background--default preset--module--divi-column--default">
<div class="et_pb_text_6 et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_module et_block_module preset--group--divi-text--divi-background--default"><div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Primary research by Grahame Hood. Sources: The Times, Bristol Times, Kentish Mercury, South London Press.</span></i></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Around 26th January 1865, George England's workforce went on strike. The Times of 30th January gave an account of the strike and the reasons it had been called:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“STRIKE OF ENGINEERS: On Saturday between 200 and 300 engineers employed at Mr George England's Hatcham Ironworks, New-cross, Deptford were out on strike, not for any increase in pay, but in consequence of what are considered very stringent rules regulating the working of the establishment. Prior to the strike taking place, meetings of the men were held, at which a deputation consisting of seven of their number was appointed to wait upon Mr England, with a request that the rule which makes a workman able to be discharged for losing one hour and a half's time should be altered to the losing of a day's time, without giving a reasonable excuse, and if so discharged, to receive the full amount of wages due; secondly, that the week's work being ended at half past four o'clock on Saturdays, payment of wages should commence at that time, and not half an hour later; thirdly that instead of losing the hour and a half's pay for being absent from work any half hour during the week, it will be altered to losing four hours in the first five days of the week, or any time before breakfast on Saturday; and fourthly, being now greatly inconvenienced by only having half an hour for dinner, to work in accordance with the original rule of the establishment, from 6am to 6pm the first five days of the week, and from 6am until half past twelve on Saturdays. The deputation having had an interview with Mr England and the alterations named above not acceded to, the men have taken their discharge.”</span></i></p>
</blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">      The Times, 30th January 1865.</span></i></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">On 1st February, an account appeared in the Bristol Times, evidently based on George England's own account of events:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“There is an extensive establishment in the metropolis known as Hatcham Iron Works, conducted by Messrs England. They have a large number of men in their employ, and a code of rules has been in existence for 25 years for the regulation of the establishment. Some of the men have taken umbrage at these rules, and a demand was submitted to the firm by a deputation of seven persons. A member of the firm kindly received the deputation, and pointed out to them that the rules had been in force for the past 25 years, but to avoid the appearance of any desire to act arbitrarily, the firm were willing to allow a committee of workmen to consider the case of any man who felt the rules pressed unduly on him, the decision of the committee to be binding upon both parties. The deputation expressed themselves satisfied with the manner in which they had been met, and Mr England invited them to take a glass of sherry, which they did. The deputation returned to the workmen, stated the result of their mission and mentioned the manner in which they had been treated. They were met with such a howl of disapprobation, accused of selling themselves for a glass of sherry, and the meeting broke up in disorder.”</span></i></p>
</blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">     Bristol Times, 1st February 1865.</span></i></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Kentish Mercury of 4th February carried a prolonged account, including a letter from one of the seven deputation members, John Bawden:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“As soon as we entered his office we were informed that we had all made ourselves liable to three months imprisonment for heading a lot of blackguards. After standing for two hours and a half in his presence, he positively refused to comply with the minor portions of our grievance.”</span></i></p>
</blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">     Kentish Mercury, 4th February 1865.</span></i></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">By 12th February, the battle lines had hardened. A general meeting of approximately 250 striking men was held at the Crown and Anchor Tavern, Old Kent Road. The secretary reported that of nearly 300 men who had struck, 100 had already obtained employment elsewhere. Not one had returned to England's employ. England had been to the North of England to recruit replacement workers and had returned unsuccessful.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">England began to modify his position. On 11th February he withdrew his old rules and posted a notice:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“The whole of the objectionable rules are withdrawn. Every one employed on these works is expected to conduct himself respectably, if he wishes to continue in the employment. G. England.”</span></i></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The gates were opened on the morning of 13th February. Around 200 men presented themselves, but were refused admittance. England wished to bar those he considered to have taken an active part in the strike. The men resolved that no one would return to work until the gates were opened unreservedly to all willing to work.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">On the evening of 15th February, a further meeting was held at the Crown and Anchor. The deputation reported that England's demeanour had been most angry and excited: he shook his stick at one member of the deputation and ordered him to leave the premises.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Finally, after five weeks, George England had to back down. The South London Press of 4th March reported:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Last night a numerously attended meeting of the workmen recently employed by Mr G. England, proprietor of the Hatcham Iron Works, and who have been on strike for 5 weeks against certain objectionable rules enforced by that gentleman, was held at the Crown and Anchor tavern, New Cross road. Mr Bowden, the secretary, reported that Mr England having consented to receive as a deputation Mr Allen, the secretary of the Amalgamated Society of Engineers, and Mr Allen of the Boiler Makers Society of the district, an interview had taken place on that day, when a long discussion occurred between the deputation and Mr England, who acceded to certain conditions for modifying the regulations.”</span></i></p>
</blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">    South London Press, 4th March 1865.</span></i></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The strike was reported over on 11th March. England had been forced to give his workers the same conditions as were offered to workers at John Penn and Sons and those working for Rennie on railway construction. He had not only lost face, but in six weeks he had reportedly lost half his workforce to other employers, decimating the skilled base he had built up over many years.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>The South Eastern Railway order</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Of the 20 locomotives England had under construction for the South Eastern Railway, only four were anywhere near completion when the strike ended. The SER commissioned a report on the state of the works, which still survives as RAIL 635/296:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“The Workshops of Messrs England and Co. are sufficiently large and their arrangement is such that eight engines and tenders might be in progress of erection at one time. There is accommodation for the required number of fitters and workers for this purpose, i.e. fifty to sixty. The number of Engines in course of erection is four; two of which have not had any work done to them for six months. Of the other two, one is approaching completion and will probably be completed about the middle, and the other by the end of June. The number of workers employed and present is about sixty; there are sometimes more and sometimes less, and the men employed in most cases stay but a short time and either leave or are summarily discharged, the reason assigned being usually incompetency. The consequence of this course is a continual influx of men to whom the work is not familiar and little progress is thereby made.”</span></i></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;"><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Report on Engines building for the South Eastern Railway Co. at the works of Messrs G. England and Co., RAIL 635/296.</span></i></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The SER used this report to back out of the full order and accept only four locomotives (Nos. 215 to 218). These were 2-4-0 locomotives with two 16 by 24 inch cylinders and 6 foot driving wheels. Of the remaining ten, two were sold to the Somerset and Dorset Railway and eight were eventually sold to the Belgian West Flanders Railway, possibly not until as late as 1868. (Some sources say two were sold to a railway in Italy, with only six going to Belgium.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The strike also cost England his capable manager Cleminson, who left due to serious illness. Cleminson went on to become a locomotive inspector by the 1871 census and subsequently Locomotive Superintendent of the Iquique and Moria Railway.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Later assessment</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A.R. Bennet, writing in 1907, offered a retrospective view:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Owing to a strike at the works, which disorganised matters for many weeks, delivery could not be effected in the time agreed upon. This was a heavy blow for the firm, and one from which they never really recovered. The locomotive industry in London laboured under sufficient disadvantage without having a trouble of this nature to contend against.”</span></i></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;"><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">A.R. Bennet, writing in 1907. Note: Grahame Hood observes that the facts in this account are not entirely accurate and reflect the author's own attitudes to trade unions.</span></i></p>
<p><!-- wp:divi/placeholder /--></p>
</div></div>
</div>
</div>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/24/the-1865-strike/">The 1865 Strike</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Locomotives of the Fairlie Engine and Steam Carriage Company: 1869-1870</title>
		<link>https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/23/locomotives-fairlie-engine-steam-carriage-company-1869-1870/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gabi.huiam.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 20:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://maybrey.hit-this.com/?p=844</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A record of the locomotives produced under the Fairlie Engine and Steam Carriage Company at Hatcham Iron Works between 1869 and 1870, the final chapter of locomotive building at Pomeroy Street. Compiled by Grahame Hood from primary sources, with notes on unresolved questions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/23/locomotives-fairlie-engine-steam-carriage-company-1869-1870/">Locomotives of the Fairlie Engine and Steam Carriage Company: 1869-1870</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section_7 et_pb_section et_section_regular et_flex_section preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--holx0rd--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1970n6--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1ts49l--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1xv09d--default">
<div class="et_pb_row_7 et_pb_row et_block_row preset--group--divi-row--divi-background--default">
<div class="et_pb_column_7 et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et-last-child et_block_column et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough preset--group--divi-column--divi-background--default preset--module--divi-column--default">
<div class="et_pb_text_7 et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_module et_block_module preset--group--divi-text--divi-background--default"><div class="et_pb_text_inner"><article><em>Compiled by Grahame Hood. Format: Year / Works No. / Wheel arrangement / Cylinders / Driving wheel / Gauge / Operator / Name.</em></p>
<p>Following the retirement of George England Senior in 1869, the Hatcham Iron Works was taken over by George England Junior and Robert Fairlie, trading as The Fairlie Engine and Steam Carriage Company. The company produced only a small number of locomotives before closing. The works were sold in 1872.</p>
<hr />
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1869</h2>
<p>Works no. n/k / 0-4-4-0T / Outside cylinders 8.25" × 13" / Driving wheel 2ft 4in / 1ft 11.5in gauge / Festiniog Railway / <strong>No. 7 Little Wonder</strong></p>
<p>The celebrated double-bogie Fairlie patent locomotive, built to demonstrate Robert Fairlie's design on the Festiniog Railway. Its success led to worldwide interest in the Fairlie system and to the building of more than 330 patent locomotives exported to 21 countries.</p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1869</h2>
<p>Works no. n/k / 0-4-4-0T / Cylinders n/k / Driving wheel n/k / Standard gauge / Purchased by England from James Cross (not built at Hatcham; built by James Cross in 1865 for the Neath and Brecon Railway) / <strong>Progress</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>"According to <cite>Engineering</cite> for 11th June 1869, p.406, England had purchased from James Cross of St Helens the engine <em>Progress</em>. It had been built three or four years ago and has recently become the property of Mr England. What he did with it, I do not know, unless he altered it and sold it under another name. Was it the Fairlie engine which went to the Chemin de fer de la Vendee?"</p>
</blockquote>
<p><small>G.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1961, p.211.</small></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1869</h2>
<p>Steam Car (details not recorded)</p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1869/1870</h2>
<p>Works no. n/k / 0-4-4-0T / Outside cylinders 10" × 18" / Driving wheel 3ft 6in / Standard gauge / Nassjo Oscarshamn Railway (Sweden) / <strong>Pioneer</strong> (later renamed <strong>Mountaineer</strong>, for the Burry Port and Gwendraeth Valley Railway in South Wales)</p>
<p>Two locomotives of the 0-4-4-0 type were ordered by the Nassjo-Oscarshamn Railway in Sweden, but the first, when completed in December 1869, was sold instead to the Burry Port and Gwendraeth Valley Railway in South Wales. In 1877 it was tried on the severe gradients of the Pantyffynon to Rhos line of the Great Western Railway. It appears to have been dismantled at Burry Port before 1900.</p>
<p>The second locomotive was delivered to Sweden to the British contractor J. Morton and Sons and named <em>Morton</em>. After the failure of this firm it was transferred to their successors Clark, Punchard and Co., who renamed it <em>Clark</em>. It later carried No. 1 of the railway. When taken over by NOJ in 1874 it was renamed <em>Hultenhein</em>. It ceased work in 1902 after a boiler explosion.</p>
<p>Dimensions for both locomotives: cylinders 10 inch diameter by 18 inch stroke; wheels 3ft 6in diameter; bogie wheelbase 5ft; total wheelbase 19ft 6in; boiler barrels 8ft 6in long by 2ft 10in diameter; heating surface of tubes 763 sq ft; fireboxes 70 sq ft; total heating surface 833 sq ft; grate area 11 sq ft; water tank capacity 700 gallons; coal bunker capacity 15cwt; total weight 25 tons.</p>
<p><small><cite>The Fairlie Locomotive</cite>, Rowland A.S. Abbott, David and Charles, 1970.</small></p>
</section>
<section>
<h2></h2>
<h2>1870</h2>
<p>Works no. n/k / 0-4-4-0T / Outside cylinders 10" × 18" / Driving wheel 3ft 6in / Standard gauge / Chemin de fer de la Vendee (France) / <strong>Angleterre</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>"A curious error in the list of engines taken over from the Chemins de fer de la Vendee points to George England as the builder of their one and only Fairlie locomotive. All the other engines taken over are listed under the maker's name, but in the case of the Fairlie locomotive there is merely the mention of <em>Angleterre</em>. I am quite convinced that this is an error, the name of the builder being taken for that of the country of origin. It might have been Cross's engine <em>Progress</em> which England purchased."</p>
</blockquote>
<p><small>G.H. Dickson, SLS Journal, 1961, p.212. Note: Grahame Hood adds: Unsure if this is correct.</small></p>
</section>
</article>
</div></div>
</div>
</div>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/08/23/locomotives-fairlie-engine-steam-carriage-company-1869-1870/">Locomotives of the Fairlie Engine and Steam Carriage Company: 1869-1870</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hatcham Iron Works</title>
		<link>https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/06/26/the-hatcham-iron-works/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gabi.huiam.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2022 19:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://maybrey.hit-this.com/?p=827</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A detailed history of the Hatcham Iron Works site at Pomeroy Street, New Cross: its unlikely origins, its expansion under George England, and the various uses of the buildings after the works closed. Compiled from primary sources including rate books, Post Office Directories, and contemporary railway press.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/06/26/the-hatcham-iron-works/">The Hatcham Iron Works</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section_8 et_pb_section et_section_regular et_flex_section preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--holx0rd--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1970n6--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1ts49l--default preset--group--divi-section--divi-background--h1xv09d--default">
<div class="et_pb_row_8 et_pb_row et_flex_row preset--group--divi-row--divi-background--default">
<div class="et_pb_column_8 et_pb_column et-last-child et_flex_column et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et_flex_column_24_24 et_flex_column_24_24_tablet et_flex_column_24_24_phone preset--group--divi-column--divi-background--default preset--module--divi-column--default">
<div class="et_pb_text_8 et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_module et_flex_module preset--group--divi-text--divi-background--default"><div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://maybrey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/hatcham-maybrey-300x277.jpg" width="300" height="277" alt="" class="wp-image-829 alignnone size-medium" /></span></i></p>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Primary research by Grahame Hood. Documentary research by C.H. Dickon, SLS Journal, 1961.</span></i></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Of all the sites to choose for a locomotive works, Pomeroy Street, London SE, seems to be one of the most unlikely.</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Although there was (and still is) a railway about half a mile to the east, and another about a quarter of a mile to the west, there was no physical connection between the works and the line, and all locomotives built at Hatcham Iron Works had to be carted by road, most probably to Bricklayers Arms, although New Cross cannot be entirely ruled out. A partial explanation of this not unique state of affairs in the nineteenth century can be found in the fact that England started out in general engineering and only built locomotives later on.”</span></i></p>
</blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">       C.H. Dickon, SLS Journal, 1961, p.138.</span></i></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Establishing the site</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The late E.L. Ahrons, in his article on George England published in The Engineer of 15th July 1921, stated that the works started about 1843. This has since been revised by documentary evidence. Mr Craven found, in the minutes of the London and Southampton Railway dated 30th April 1839, an entry for a payment to George England for tools. England also took out Patent No. 8058 on 7th May 1839 for a screw jack, and Patent No. 8860 on 2nd March 1841 for a woollen weaving machine.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Post Office Directories of the period make no reference to England until the 1846 edition, which reads: England, George and Co. Engineers and patent screw jack manufacturers, Hatcham Inn (sic) Works, Old Kent Road. A search of the rate books conducted by the Town Clerk of Deptford shows that George first paid rates on the property in July 1840.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The name Geo England is scribbled in pencil against premises that had been empty for about a year. The property, listed as a House and Manufactory belonging to Henry Duxford, had been occupied by a William Morgan for at least six years.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Henry Duxbury had been in the leather trade. The Post Office Directory of 1823 shows him as a water-proof leather-dresser and leather-hat maker. By 1832, his entry reads: Duxbury, H., Patentee for Splitting Hides and Skins, Pomeroy, Old Kent Street.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Expansion and the test track</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In 1853, the factory was extended, being largely occupied at that time in making castings for the Crystal Palace. In 1861/2 a further, larger extension was added on the north side of the original works in Pomeroy Street. At the rear of the new works was a piece of land nicknamed the cabbage patch, on which was laid an oval of standard gauge track, like a large toy train set. There was a rail connection into the main building and the circle was used to test locomotives in steam.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Moving locomotives to the railhead</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">One noteworthy aspect of the Hatcham site was that it had no direct access to the main railway system. All finished engines had to be taken by road to the nearest railhead. A. R. Rosling described the method used:</span></p>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“The transport was managed by means of a heavy lorry mounted on four strong wheels, with very broad tread. Rails were laid on the lorry, and an inclined plane with rails upon it secured to the back so as to make a connection with rails upon the ground. The engine to be taken away was hauled onto the wagon by means of eight horses pulling on the fall of a block and tackle.”</span></i></p>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">A.R. Rosling, Locomotive Building in London, The Railway Magazine, November 1907.</span></i></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">At New Cross there once existed a siding to the west of the shed but at a lower level, which terminated without permanent buffer stops at the end of Five Bells Lane (later Hatcham Park Road). It was to this siding that some of the locomotives built by George England were brought from his Hatcham Iron Works in Pomeroy Street, to start the journey to their purchaser.</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Working conditions for apprentices</h3>
<blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">“The conditions of employment for apprentices was quoted: they were articled to the firm for seven years, the first three without pay, boys receiving however, one shilling per week for good conduct.”</span></i></p>
</blockquote>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">      The Kentish Mercury, 8th November 1858, quoted by C.H. Rickon.</span></i></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>After George England</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Following the effects of the 1865 strike, the works were taken over by The Fairlie Engine and Steam Carriage Company. This did not thrive and the works were sold in 1872.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The 1853 building was occupied by the General Engine and Boiler Company from 1873. In the mid-1930s they became Reliance Foundry, who remained until 1981, after which the building was demolished.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The original part of the factory housed the Delta Metal Company, who were succeeded by the Pomeroy Paper Mills and then an automotive engineering shop. The 1862 portion was bought in 1877 by J.C. Eno, of Fruit Salts fame, though they left due to bombing in 1940. After the war the building was used by the pharmaceutical firm of Robert Blackie and Company until 1969, after which it was pulled down to make space for housing.</span></p>
</div></div>
</div>
</div>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk/2022/06/26/the-hatcham-iron-works/">The Hatcham Iron Works</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maybrey.co.uk">Maybrey</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
